Uncategorized

The Monster: Indie Horror with an Unoriginal Title

The Monster (2016)

Written and directed by Bryan Bertino

I am a total sucker for monster movies, otherwise known as “the creature feature.” People point to Creature From the Black LagoonThe Wolfman, or Dracula. Me? I point to classics like JawsAmerican Werewolf in London, Godzilla,  or Night of the Living Dead.

But I also love the hot garbage they typically serve up on places like the SyFy channel: SharktopusAbominable, and everything in-between. Hence when I chose to start ventures in screenwriting, I wrote Snake-Bear, which is as literal as it sounds. It served as a parody with a purpose. And much like my beloved furry hissing friend, this movie, Bertino’s The Monster, is not just a monster movie; it’s a film with a pulse and purpose.

Sometime in the fall of 2016, I saw the trailer for The Monster. And it did not disappoint. The tense shots of terror, the impeccable lighting, and quick transitions all had me hooked. When I saw that it was being distributed by A24 Films, that was the final straw (spoiler alert: they’ve had a great year). I needed to see this movie.

Because this genre is right in my wheelhouse, I’ve grown accustomed to keeping a sort-of checklist in my head, one that allows me to discern whether or not the film is successful in it’s attempt to reinvigorate the genre. It looks vaguely something like this:

  • Is the monster interesting?
  • Does the monster appear to symbolize anything?
  • Is that symbolism foreshadowed or set-up?
  • Do we give a crap about the characters?
  • Is the mood clear?

So, in using this checklist, let’s review this.

Overview

The Monster follows the story of Kathy (Zoe Kazan) and her daughter, Lizzy (Ella Ballentine), as they navigate the roadways of adulting and parenthood en route to bring Lizzy to her father’s house. Let’s just say the mother-daughter relationship here is…rocky. Verrrrrrry rocky. Like “scream ‘fuck you’ over and over and over and over again in a garage because daughter doesn’t want her shitty mother to go to the school play” rocky. Oof. (Symbolism? Check and check.)

As Kathy takes her daughter on the road, their conversations are sparse and frustrating, thinly-veiled apologies coupled with appropriately intermittent flashback sequences showing just how bad of a parent Kathy is. As a heavy rain descends upon their night-time trek, they hit a wolf in the road, thus sending this road trip into chaos. With every minute that transpires, they wait for help to arrive. While Lizzy has these premonitory ideas of the wolf being hit, the car being toast, and the wolf’s body being dragged away by something, Kathy does her best to put on her big-girl pants and parent her daughter into not fearing whatever may be out there.

 Continuing the Checklist

Much like that of Spielberg’s Jaws, we only catch glimpses of the elusive monster, typically in silhouette or a specifically opaque shot of the monster in the background lurking. While the shark does not appear until nearly an hour into Jaws, the titular monster appears approximately 45 minutes in, which is certainly comparable time-wise, considering the 91 minute run-time of this film. When we do see it in its entirety, the thing is a hulking and wolfish monstrosity, with slick or charred black skin, whitish opaline eyes, and immense teeth, much like your classic “Little Red Riding Hood” nursery rhyme. This seems fitting because the film begins with a title card from an “unknown” child’s nursery rhyme. (More foreshadowing here.)

So is the monster cool? Yes and no. Yes in that the creature itself is not-so-typical. In the third act, Kathy realizes that the creature is resistant to light being cast on it. It’s not a silver bullet, but it demonstrates weakness and a connectedness to the overall symbolism behind the monster. When we look at the aforementioned dumpster fire relationship, there are so many instances where vices, like drinking, drugs, etc., are all valued more than that of the life of the child in the picture. In this case, as the metaphor suggests, the monster’s resistance to the light is much like that of the terrible things that Kathy has done to Lizzy “being brought to light.” It’s literal, but I’m cool with that. (Mood? Check.)

 

Where the monster fails at being cool lies within the very obvious influences it draws from to be a successful monster. For one, it bears a striking resemblance to the creatures found in the Feast film franchise. The difference here is that is not bipedal, but slinks around like a predator of the night. Another obvious influence would be that of Stephen King’s Cujo. There’s a distinct break from this film and Cujo, but the creature’s dog-like aspects make us begin to believe that its wolfishness is on purpose. Don’t forget the fact that much of the film takes place within the claustrophobic confines of an old car. At this point in the horror genre, it’s pretty hard to be original.

Strengths

1. Short cast lists are aesthetically pleasing.

The movie features only a handful of prominent actors that hold any value to the telling of the story. Kazan and Ballentine have the most screen time, where we also see a tow-truck driver and paramedics who arrive on scene who are only there as red shirts to be devoured by the monster. Scott Speedman (yes, that Scott Speedman) plays the deadbeat dad who is partially responsible for the detriment of the child’s younger years. He’s on-screen for about two minutes and that’s also fine by me. Kazan and Ballentine are dynamic throughout and really help this film in the telling of this story.

2. Lighting is everything.

I would be the last person to remark about lighting in films, mostly because my dominant focus is on things like shot composition, mise-en-scene, and angles. In this, the director’s choice to rely on minimal lighting exacerbates the tension and scare factor of the creature lurking in the shadows. Much of the light presented on screen during the second act comes from a flashlight, headlights from the car, and a single street light on the road. It fits, thematically, with the monster so well, and if anything, it helps foreshadow both its strength and its demise.

3. Flashbacks are used appropriately and effectively.

Not to beat a dead wolf, but this film heavily relies on flashbacks to relay its message and deeper meanings. The number of flashbacks average about one per act (if my memory serves me), and that seems kind of perfect given the circumstances. People will want to watch this movie because a big thing eats some people, but you have to give the people a reason to live and fight. These flashbacks give us everything we need to invest in this story. (Care about characters, aka just Lizzy? Check.)

Weaknesses

1. The third act is…too fast.

When a writer acts on their natural urge to “make their characters suffer,” it’s more helpful than not to give us time to breathe. Sure, the flashbacks offer some of that time for reflection and understanding, but the third act of this movie feels rushed and largely unfinished. The third act does accomplish most of the things it wants to: the mother realizes how much of a piece of shit she is, the creature is conquered and killed, and Lizzy gets her much-needed freedom. However, amidst the revelations Kathy has, she ultimately decides to sacrifice herself to the monster in an attempt to allow Lizzy to get away. Naturally, it doesn’t go as planned, the monster kills Kathy, they have a sad death gurgle scene together, and the responsibility falls on Lizzy’s shoulders. Had it not been overtly clear throughout that Lizzy is the only responsible character in the movie, we would question this. However, Lizzy uses fire to extinguish the beast and make it out alive just as dawn breaks.It doesn’t feel like a full act as the film closes. We are left with some unconscious need unmet. Where will she go? To be successful, did she need to let her mother die? Lizzy is really the only character in the whole movie we really care about. She is our eyes and ears. We are invested in her; we empathize with her and her struggle. Reasonably, I don’t think Kathy does enough to prove her love, her ability to be a parent, or earn the forgiveness of Lizzy or the audience. It definitely feels like a deal-breaker because it is.

Conclusion

I’m sure there are other weaknesses to be found in this film, but overall it was exactly what it needed to be and it met the expectations that I had set for it. As an indie horror flick, it sates one’s need to invest in a story that means something, especially one that fits the genre so well. It’s message is powerful and it resonates throughout, right down to the monster itself. It’s not the most ground-breaking monster movie ever made, but it’s one that I can safely recommend for those interested in the genre.

 

Score: Three partially eaten tow-truck drivers out of five.

 

Reviews

Manchester By the Sea: A Cathartic Gem and Future (Multiple) Oscar-Winner

Manchester By The Sea (2016)

Written and Directed by Kenneth Lonergan

 

mv5bmtyxmjk0ndg4ml5bml5banbnxkftztgwodcynja5ote-_v1_ux182_cr00182268_al_

Let me start this review by deeply exhaling, borderline sobbing, into a nearby pillow. Jesus Christ. I can do this.

Casey Affleck jovially suggested in his recent gig hosting SNL that Manchester By The Sea was very sad. Depressingly sad. Just very, very sad. He wasn’t joking and, if anything, I could suggest that him joking about this movie being sad was a half-assed version of a trigger warning.

Overview

Manchester By The Sea follows the story of Lee Chandler (Affleck), as he attempts to navigate through life as a lowly multi-apartment custodian. He lives alone, drinks alone, eats alone. Are you seeing a trend? When he is floored by news about his brother Joe’s death (Kyle Chandler), he is forced to take on the responsibilities left to him by his brother. This includes taking permanent guardianship of his nephew, Patrick (Lucas Hedges), maintaining Joe’s fishing vessel, which in turn means dramatic changes to Lee’s life as a lonely sad person.

Throughout the narrative, we get glimpses of flashbacks that set up the more current goings-on. Each one offers the viewers a greater context behind the thought-process of Lee, his former relationship with his ex-wife Randi (Michelle Williams), and even earlier interactions with young Patrick out on Joe’s fishing boat. It is through these we come to understand why Lee is so reluctant and resistant to take on all of these responsibilities, despite wanting to respect Joe’s posthumous wishes. With everything having come to a head, Lee is forced to acknowledge the greatest factor in all of this, his past.

Catharsis (and Spoilers)

To me, this isn’t a film that truly warrants a “spoiler” warning. Much like the content of the film, it is worth tackling head-on in a way that allows just as the heading says, “catharsis.”

When I walked out of this movie, I didn’t feel like I could say anything about it. It felt real; arguably, it was too real. To say anything that vaguely resembled criticism would be almost self-deprecating. While the events that transpire within Manchester don’t fully reflect events that I have experienced, but I have dared myself to find a film that I connected, or even sympathized, with more. I failed to do so.

Manchester By The Sea has a few choked-up-worthy moments, including a seemingly inconspicuous trip to the grocery store after Lee shuffles his buddies out of his house at 2 AM. Lee trudges down to the store, too drunk to drive, and when he returns, his house is on fire. Randi is being held back by police and firefighters both as she screams, “My kids are in there!” Lee stands in awe as his life unravels before his eyes.

Following this, we see another flashback of the next day, where Lee is being questioned by police at the station about what caused the fire. It is then to be revealed that the fire may have been Lee’s fault, as a log he placed in the fireplace has begun to smolder and rolled out onto the carpet to set the home ablaze. Lee recalls not putting up the gate in front of the fireplace. Lee is let-off, scot-free, much to his own surprise. “We’re not gonna crucify you, Lee. It was an accident.” Even despite having admitted to smoking marijuana, getting drunk, and possibly dabbling in cocaine, Lee is dumbfounded to be set free. Upon confirming he has a ride home with his brother and father with police, he walks out of the interrogation room, and with that oft-noted Lee Chandler moment of hesitation, he swipes a gun off of an officer and presses the gun to his temple. He is tackled and smothered by officers and his family before he is able to commit the deed.

Fuck.

Over the course of the film, whenever Lee is faced with a difficult decision, he crumbles. That one-time-family-man Lee turns into a disheveled and drunken bar-brawler because he has no other way of coping with the shit he’s had to deal with in his life. He drinks heavily. He fights. He punches the walls. These are all textbook examples of behaviors belonging to a lot of different mental ailments, but perhaps most importantly, Manchester serves as a reminder of the crippling effects PTSD. And that is something I can connect with.

I lost my mother when I was twelve years old. Not only is it something that I have accepted in the past thirteen years, but it has become a part of who I am today. It has shaped me in many ways, including serving as a catalyst for my successes in my young adult life. In 2013, my father was dramatically affected by the explosion of an apartment building right next door to where we used to life. He has been living with the harmful effects of smoke inhalation, minor scars from the burns he received, but the most devastating thing he’s had to deal with is PTSD.

It’s hard to understand why people with PTSD do what they do. To them, it is rational thinking, but within the confines of constant neurotic turmoil. It is safe to say that my father is not the same person today as he was five years ago. It’s been an incredibly difficult experience since then, but it comes with a mutual understanding between my father and I: life is full of bumps, barriers, hazards, and breakdowns, but how we deal with these things is what makes us who we are. My father’s PTSD has slowed him down immensely, but that has not stopped him from continuing to support his family, work his steady job, and try to make the most of a terrible situation.

In many ways, watching Casey Affleck’s brilliant performance as Lee Chandler sparked a range of mixed emotions. When I saw Lee Chandler on-screen, I saw my father over and over again: a past (or present for Lee) of alcoholism, the distant relationships with family and friends,  and disengaged conversations. Manchester felt almost too real, too relatable to my life. From taking place in New England (seeing as I am from mid-coast Maine), the range of botched New England accents, catching Bruins hockey games on TV, right down to the fricking forest green Carhartt jacket that Lee wears, which I am convinced is the same one my dad still owns today.

Strengths

1. The acting in this movie is easily the best thing about it.

The combination of Casey Affleck and Michelle Williams, despite her limited supporting role, is one for the books. Affleck, calling it now, will win the Best Actor Oscar for this role. Lee Chandler is a tragic character in every sense of the word. Affleck takes on Lee’s hopes and dreams, watches them all fall apart, and tries to pick up the pieces in such a way that we aren’t capable of discerning whether or not we should help him or continue looking on at the train wreck in front of us. Furthermore, Lucas Hedges’ portrayal of Patrick, whose accent isn’t terrible, is also sure to garner the Academy’s favor. Never before have I wanted to cry watching someone pick up frozen meat off the floor before amidst a panic attack.

2. Pacing and flashback sequences are on-point.

In a world where most movie-goers aren’t really interested in sitting through a two-hour sobfest, Lonergan’s writing and direction are paced brilliantly to make sure no one is bored. Every scene feels like it means something to the story, enhancing our views of Patrick, Lee, or the past with Randi and Joe. Each flashback gives us valuable insight and information that evokes profound emotion and shows passion for the story, structure, and characters on screen. No scene is too long or too short. It just feels right. Manchester is Ken Lonergan’s baby and we need to respect him for it.

Weaknesses

1. There’s one scene that needed to be in the movie.

Near the end of the second act of Manchester, Lee is running errands downtown and runs into Randi on the street. She offers him lunch or a cup of coffee, but Lee being Lee, he wants no part of it. She is upset, not with him, but with herself. She exclaims, “I love you,” which tugs at our heartstrings even more. Randi profusely apologizes to Lee, trying to find some vulnerability, some opening, to get him to come out of his shell. She says something to the effect of “I should burn in hell for all the things I said to you,” referencing the blame-game that ensued following the deaths of their children. It might be minor, but I wanted that scene. I think it would have pushed her performance over the edge, not just teetering, for a future gold statuette for Williams.

Conclusion

Manchester By The Sea is nothing short of powerful. Despite my cathartic gushing and wallowing, I wish to repeat that it’s been a long time, if not the first time, that a movie made me feel the things I felt watching this movie. Lee might not be the easiest character to empathize with, but damn is it hard not to root for him to turn his life around.

To try to make both of us feel better, here’s Casey Affleck’s “Mayor of Dunkins” skit from SNL.

Score: A probably biased 5 Vanilla Nut Taps out of 5

Reviews

Rogue One: A Rouge-Hot Review

My name is Will and I am not a Star Wars lifer. I’m not even a Star Wars quarter-lifer. I didn’t see my first Star Wars film until I reviewed in on my other blog, Dr. Awesome Film Reviews, back in 2013. It was a sweet experience, one that was filled with references that made me exclaim, “Yep, that was from Star Wars the whoooooole time.”

Since then, we’ve been blessed with two brand new additions to the canon, Star Wars VII: The Force Awakens, and now Rogue One. With TFA being stellar, Rogue One had big shoes to fill, since most other Star Wars prequels had been, well….terrible. So, with all of that out in the open, it’s safe to say that Rogue One was not only great, but it made people go out of their way to completely forget how to spell! What chaos!

rogueone_onesheeta_1000_309ed8f6

The story of Rogue One is centered around a rogue one, Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones), who is the daughter of formerly-Imperial-scientist-turned-farmer-turned-saboteur-Imperial-scientist, Galen Erso (Mads Mikkelson). As a young girl, her father is taken from her by the Empire, more specifically by power-hungry Director Orson Krennic (Ben Mendelsohn), as Galen has the scientific book-smarts to help the Empire build a super-weapon capable of destroying planets. Wait for it…the Death Star. Flash forward approximately fifteen years and Jyn finds herself amidst Rebellion-led attempts to desperately seek intelligence about this new weapon. She falls in with an Alliance officer, Cassian Andor (Diego Luna), as they scour various planets and moons seeking information that would lead them to Jyn’s father and/or the building of the Death Star.

When on the moon Jedha, they are taken captive by the extreme militant, Saw Gerrara (Forest Whitaker), aka Mr. “I CAN’T ESCAPE MY FALLOUT POWER ARMOR COSPLAY,” who not only has information about the whereabouts of Galen, but also a defected Imperial pilot who aids in their quest and a hologram message from Galen himself. Within this message, we are exposed to the secret plot conducted by Galen all along: he specifically sabotaged the construction of the Death Star, the single easily-overlooked weakness that we’ve all come to know and understand from the original Star Wars film. Cassian and Jyn work together, alongside the Alliance’s rebellion, to seek out the plans for the construction of the Death Star so the Alliance can work to destroy it (in future films).

Note: beyond this mark, there be spoilers. AHHHHHHHHHHH!

Image may contain: 1 person, text

Okay, so, there’s some great stuff going on here. Like every film, the movie has incredible strengths and somewhat devastating weaknesses. To really flesh these ideas out, I’m going to directly and indirectly spoil some key sequences. You’ve been warned.

Strengths

1. The supporting cast is easily the best thing about this movie.

Without the supporting actors, this script flops. Key members of the ensemble like Whitaker, Mendelsohn, and Donnie-Facking-Yen really make this movie great. While Whitaker’s character is merely a stepping stone that gets rolled in the destruction of Jedha, Whitaker gives this character life. He’s described as an “extremist,” yet he’s awfully soft-spoken. That’s what makes him terrifying. There’s a really unsettling scene of Saw using a miniature Godzilla villain to nearly lobotomize the Imperial pilot. No thank you.

Krennic’s capture of Galen in the opening scene inevitably led him to seize more power within the Empire’s hierarchy. Mendelsohn’s performance is what dreams are made of; he’s great as a slimy, conniving, corrupt, and fear-inducing villain that’ll do anything to please Vader and the Emperor. Naturally being Australian, Mendelsohn’s rage slips in and out of accent, but y’know, I don’t care. It makes the anger more believable.

Donnie Yen, probably best known for the Ip Man franchise, plays a pivotal role in the supporting cast. He is one-part Legolas, one-part Ip Man, and one-part blind comedic relief. In the scene where Gerrara’s men capture him alongside Jyn and Cassian, he is hooded and dragged away. In doing so, he yells, “Are you kidding me? I’m blind!” Not a single person in the theater wasn’t dying of laughter.

2. Darth Vader is still too cool for Jedi school.

Holy shit. Man. Vader has two scenes in the movie, but it’s not like the Joker in Suicide Squad. MOTHERFUCKERS EVEN GOT JAMES EARL JONES IN ON THIS. Phew. Okay. I’m ready.

Vader’s presence is often alluded to early on, specifically by Krennic. Once we see him, both in burnt-skin-sitting-in-my-spa form and the classic heavy-breathing version, it evokes nothing but the classic sense of terror, suspense, and fanboy nostalgia that every 40-something felt seeing the original iteration in theaters back in the late 1970s. As for a real spoiler, Vader’s last scene, in the final five/seven minutes of the film, is nothing short of breathtaking. You watch it, you see the Alliance officers skittering like rats into a sewer grate, and you just have to say, “Those dudes are fuuuuuuuucked.”

3. The Star Wars realm continues to be vast and awesome.

Much like my first time viewing the original trilogy, this film continuously had me blown away by the creative worlds, characters, and creatures that inhabit each one. Whether its the former Jedi Temple’s home of Jedha, the Imperial base on the tropical planet, Scarif, or Eadu, the mining planet that has more lightning strikes than Florida, these places are immense and can be easily recollected because of their unique characteristics.

Weaknesses

1. Jyn Erso fits the mold as an unlikable protagonist.

The more I thought about this idea, the more it made sense. Jyn Erso is not that interesting, but rather a more plastic and less versatile Rey. The writers and new-age Star Wars-think-tankers, I’m sure, are gunning to revitalize the narrative of “female protagonists in male-dominated genres are what we need!” Yes, that is technically accurate. However, Jyn’s narrative is one that is fraught with skepticism. Do they trust her? No. Can she command the audience in an Alliance town-hall meeting? You bet your sweet bippy. But how did they establish that trust? It’s kind of loose justification, especially if you’re leaning on her biggest critic, Cassian. I guess having him feel guilty about maybe sniping Galen without her knowledge is enough. Maybe it isn’t.

Just as characters are dying left and right on screen, we feel more connected to them and their struggles than hers. “Rebellions are built on hope” she says in the trailer. Apparently Cassian’s lines aren’t the only thing she steals from this movie. Lord of the Rings fans (at least many of them) will tell you similar struggles with how whiny and childish Frodo is, and even some Star Wars fans will tell you how much they find Luke Skywalker to be equally insufferable. Jyn just doesn’t cut it. She’s got the personality of a clipboard, yet we are compelled to follow her to the end of her journey.

2. Game of Thrones character arcs are a tough pill to swallow.

Are you familiar with the story of the 300 Spartans? A rogue group of soldiers are sent on their way  like some kinda “suicide squad” to defeat an insurmountable empire? Ring any bells? It should, because Rogue One is a glorified, albeit more interesting, version of that story.

In the same vein, Game of Thrones appears. On the ride home from the movies, my fiancee was particularly upset with the fact that almost every single new character from Rogue One dies. Jyn, Cassian, Donnie Yen, Krennic, Donnie Yen’s bodyguard who probably has a name, Galen, Saw Gerrara. All of ’em. Whether it’s in battle with the Empire on Scarif, getting planet’d to death on Jedha, or totally eating your words and getting Death-Starred (I’m looking at you, Krennic), they’re just super dead. In fitting the mold of the 300 Spartans mythos, they have to die. They don’t exist in A New Hope. They are the soldiers sent, or in this case volunteered, to be slaughtered for the rebellion. My fiancee is not wrong. It doesn’t feel great to watch the characters that you establish a connection with die on-screen. The difference here is that it doesn’t feel gratuitous like Game of Thrones, where killing characters is the sport of choice for George R.R. Martin. They serve a purpose; they’re not red shirts. We care for these characters, but we also know what’s coming: a new hope.

Conclusion

Rogue One is a bonafide hit. It hits all the right notes, pulls your heart strings, and generates a lot of empathy and laughs alike. While the inevitable heat death of most of the characters isn’t awesome, the fact that easily-recognized characters emerge pre-Episode IV, including a CGI Moff Tarkin, is a nice throwback for fanboys and movie-goers everywhere. It should also be said that this is easily the most ethnically diverse cast ever assembled for a Star Wars flick. Sure we got John Boyega and Daisy Ridley for Episode VII, but this is different. This feels bigger. I can see great things coming on the horizon for this franchise.

Score: 4.5 Rouges out of 5